Thursday, June 26, 2008

Beans


There's a man in those beans somewhere. Really. I kid you not, and once you find him, you'll wonder why you ddin't see him instantly.
I don't know where this came from, but the story in the email (thanks Robin) suggested that if you find the man in the coffee beans in 3 seconds, the right half of your brain is better developed than most people. If you find the man between 3 seconds and 1 minute, the right half of the brain is developed normally, and if you find the man between 1 minute and 3 minutes, then the right half of your brain is functioning slowly and you need to eat more protein. If you have not found the man after 3 minutes, the advice is to look for more of this type of exercise to make that part of the brain stronger.
It took me a little while. I was too busy looking at the Predator (from the movie of the same name).

Friday, June 20, 2008

Are We Going Mad?

"Young people today have no respect!"

I used to hear my father say it, and his father before him. My great grandfather probably said it in some foreign Eastern European language, and I suspect there's probably a well worn Latin or Ancient Greek version.

It seems each successive generation looks at those who come after with disbelief, fearful for the future of society and the world. Despite those fears, each successive generation seems to muddle through, and the world our forefathers have built is a pretty good one.

That's changing because I believe that world is about to come crashing down.

Young people today really do have no respect. They don't respect the law. They don't respect those around them. They don't respect standards of common decency.

Why? Because our generation of stupid bleeding hearts has removed punishment as a sanction. If you're under 16 these days, you can do pretty much anything you like knowing that the worst that's likely to happen is you'll get a session of "counselling" during which some limp do-gooder will tell you in their softest, most unthreatening voice, that what you might have done may not have been appropriate.

No criminal conviction is recorded. You're not sent away to some child correctional facility, and no-one is allowed to give you a swift kick in the backside (literally, not metaphorically).

So that there's no mistaking the point I'm trying to make, let me state it clearly. I believe the success of Western Civilisation has been built on mutual respect and a sense of community. At every level of society, our forefathers acted (mostly) for the common good. Yes, they had a degree of individual freedom, and yes, that freedom allowed them to do much as they pleased, but there was an understanding that expression of that freedom came with a responsibility to use it to preserve common values and build a better future.

Today, young people are raised to believe it's everyone for themselves. We pander to the excesses of youth with plattitudes... "oh... they just need better guidance", or "they're just expressing their individuality".

We don't even draw proper boundaries. Last week, the government here in New South Wales was forced by public outcry to withdraw a brochure advising teenagers of how they should experiment with drugs "responsibly". They called it "harm minimisation", and all the bleeding hearts were shouting "but kids will take drugs, so we have to give them the right information".

Crap. It's the wrong signal. It says "look... we know these drugs are illegal, but we also know you're going to take them and that's ok." No. It's NOT ok, and to say it sends very mixed signals indeed.

Take the case yesterday in Canada, where the Quebec Superior Court overturned a father's decision to ground his 12 year old daughter as punishment for disobeying his direction not to visit websites he deemed "innapropriate". (She had disobeyed him by going to a friends house to post improper photographs of herself on some "social networking" site.)

Are they serious? First, what is a 12 year old girl doing taking her parents to court so she's not grounded. Second, why is the state funding this stupidity, and third, what was the judge thinking?

I don't know what it's like in Canada, the UK, the USA, or any of the other places my readers live. I just know what it's like here in Australia. Children are an undisciplined rabble, subject to minimal parental cotrol, prone to binge drinking, antisocial behaviour and an utter disregard for theose around them. They seem born to accept that the world owes them, and that there are no sanctions for ill manners, or even criminal activity. They get into their 20s unemployable, with a sense of entitlement that they have not yet earned.

Enough is enough. It's time we wrested control back from the social engineers and began applying and enforcing standards of decency and behaviour. If we don't, Western Civilisation will continue to teeter towards the edge of a precipice.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

No Substitute For Stupidity

These are pictures of the wreck of a brand spanking new Etihad Airbus A340-600. Etihad, as my well traveled readers will know, is the National Airline of the United Arab Emirates and sprukes itself as the "world's best new airline".

In November 2007, an Etihad flight crew was given the responsibility of moving their still unfinished aircraft out of the hangar to the aircraft run-up area. We're really talking "unfinished". The 'plane was an empty shell... no seats, no carpet, no overhead lockers, no entertainment system, no catering equipment, nothing. Just a very light empty aluminium tube with wings, a cockpit, a tail and a few engines.

The Airbus supervisor, in an oversight that I suspect will never be repeated, decided he didn't need to accompany or supervise his Arab friends, so they were left to figure it out on their own.

For reasons I'm not sure anyone will fully understand, the Etihad crew took all four engines to takeoff power. Maybe boys were just being boys, or maybe the gene pool needs thinning a little (or both), because they had no clue just how light of an empty Airbus really is. No chocks were set (not that it would have mattered at that power setting), and the brakes weren't going to hold the 'plane back at full power.

The takeoff warning horn was blaring away in the cockpit because the computers thought they were trying to takeoff but it had not yet been fully configured. Somehow, it didn't occur to these guys to simply throttle back... or maybe that wouldn't have been as much fun. They decided instead, in what can only be described as a stroke of pure genius, to pull the 'Ground Sense' circuit breaker to silence the alarms.

Big mistake! All they did was fool the aircraft's computers into thinking they were in the air. As soon as they did that, the computers automatically released all the brakes and set the A340-600 rocketing forward. The poor bastards had no idea that this is a Safety feature so that pilots can't land with the brakes on.

The result is pictured. [*sigh*].






Thursday, June 12, 2008

Oops.


I forgot to put the bins out last night. You know how it is. You're tired. You're grumpy because your state just lost a big football match. You just forget. It happens.

But by the reception from Dr J this morning, you'd think I'd had a personal hand in scheduling trains during the WWII.

Dr J: You didn't put the bins out last night.
Me: Oh. Of course. Wednesday was garbage night. Sorry. Are they out now?
Dr J: Yes. I was able to put them out just in time.
Me: Oh. Good. That was lucky. Has the truck been? I'll bring them in.
Dr J: No.
Me: [looking puzzled... brain trying to redefine 'just in time']
Dr J: I am not happy. [glare]

Seriously. What is it with women and the putting out of the garbage?

Sunday, June 01, 2008

Good Dog! Woof!

Vacuous

We've spent a great deal of time in my business skirting around the edges of an industry that can best be described as vacuous, shallow and facile. I'm talking, of course, about the "Beauty Industry", that collection of salons and pseudo spas dedicated to the shrines of youth and beauty.

Today, Beauty Business launched their on-line magazine, leading with a story archetypally titled
"Tanning: Choosing the right shade for those cooler months."

Other stories in this launch issue included
"Hair Removal: Why winter is the BEST time for removing the fuzz"
and
"Celebrity Beauty Tips: Demi Moore, Beyonce Knowles and more."

*sigh*.

This is a magazine pitched at the "beauty therapists", and it would be nice to think their industry magazine was devoted to improving professional standards and elevating the knowledge base. Sadly, it isn't, not because the editors are incapable of creating such a worthy tome, but because the magazine, as it should, reflects its target market.

And what's really scary is that in Australia, according to our market research numbers, we have one salon for every 100 women aged between 35 and 60. I'm guessing the numbers are similar in the US, Canada and parts of Europe.

In a thousand years, when historians are giving lectures on the decline and fall of Western Civilisation, there will be an entire semester devoted to this cult and culture of bimbo.

I suppose, if you're interested, GO HERE. (But only if you must.)